Posts:
3,999
Registered:
4-Aug-2006
|
|
|
Re: jAlbum 37 beta for testing
Posted:
19 Jan 25, 00:19
in response to: davidekholm
|
|
|
Looking at the readers & writers listed the 'Standard JPEG Image Reader' and 'Standard JPEG Image Writer' are listed twice, the first can be deselected the second can't. Are they actually the same?
|
|
|
Posts:
682
Registered:
13-Apr-2006
|
|
|
Re: jAlbum 37 beta for testing
Posted:
19 Jan 25, 08:31
in response to: RobM
|
|
|
Rob, thanks for your help! I'm now on 37b3 and will play with it.
|
|
|
Posts:
3,624
Registered:
18-Oct-2002
|
|
|
Re: jAlbum 37 beta for testing
Posted:
19 Jan 25, 18:46
in response to: RobM
|
|
|
Would it not be easier, for you and the user, if only image formats that had multiple readers/writers are shown? At the very least if there is only one reader/writer for a format then it/they should be greyed out.
Well, some users experience crashes with some DNG files, and removing the RAW support by unticking the RAW reader would be an easy workaround until we've rewritten the RAW support. I'd prefer to keep it like this, it's under Preferences->Advanced after all.
|
|
|
Posts:
3,624
Registered:
18-Oct-2002
|
|
|
Re: jAlbum 37 beta for testing
Posted:
19 Jan 25, 18:49
in response to: RobM
|
|
|
Looking at the readers & writers listed the 'Standard JPEG Image Reader' and 'Standard JPEG Image Writer' are listed twice, the first can be deselected the second can't. Are they actually the same?
No, the one that isn't disabled is mislabeled. It's actually TwelveMonkey's version of the standard JPEG reader. You can disclose that by hovering the mouse over a reader or writer.
|
|
|
Posts:
3,999
Registered:
4-Aug-2006
|
|
|
Re: jAlbum 37 beta for testing
Posted:
19 Jan 25, 20:15
in response to: davidekholm
|
|
|
Looking at the readers & writers listed the 'Standard JPEG Image Reader' and 'Standard JPEG Image Writer' are listed twice, the first can be deselected the second can't. Are they actually the same?
No, the one that isn't disabled is mislabeled. It's actually TwelveMonkey's version of the standard JPEG reader. You can disclose that by hovering the mouse over a reader or writer.
Got it, only noticed it when I'd taken a screen grab of the panels.
|
|
|
Posts:
682
Registered:
13-Apr-2006
|
|
|
Re: jAlbum 37 beta for testing
Posted:
19 Jan 25, 22:05
in response to: MarkusD
|
|
|
I now compiled an album with 37b3 and saw a good improvement. It compiled in 0:10:16. The last time I compiled with the version 36.1 it took 0:15:53.
This is the result with 37b3:
0,003s ==>
AlbumBean.registerVariables: 17127 calls 7m 32,86s
AlbumObjectImpl.getMetadata: 15852 calls 6m 33,961s
AlbumObjectImpl.getXmpManager: 18503 calls 6m 31,529s
Process compiled expression: 765 calls 2m 58,934s
predir processing: 762 calls 2m 50,495s
AlbumObjectImpl.getProperties: 16712 calls 2m 16,137s
AlbumObjectProperties.load: 16714 calls 2m 15,623s
HardwareSmoothScaler.scale: 376 calls 31,469s
FileFilters.getBasicImageInfo: 15667 calls 28,463s
Executing compiled scriptlet: 100647 calls 27,557s
Writing pages: 2327 calls 24,001s
AlbumBean.getFolderProperties: 1394 calls 21,204s
Reading file attributes: 6689 calls 20,449s
AlbumBean.makeIndexPages: 762 calls 20,331s
AlbumBean.countTotalFiles: 1 calls 18,976s
FileFilters.loadImage: 275 calls 18,387s
JAlbumUtilities.getDeepCameraDates: 762 calls 11,144s
init: 1 calls 9,554s
JAlbumUtilities.countCategories: 6953 calls 9,341s
Create MediaRSS: 762 calls 7,173s
AlbumBean.popVars: 64469 calls 7,04s
FileFilters.saveImage: 518 calls 4,506s
Executing interpreted scriptlet: 105239 calls 3,811s
JSONMaker.makeDataPages: 762 calls 3,31s
AlbumBean.pushVars: 64470 calls 2,752s
JAlbumUtilities.countWebLocationCategories: 997 calls 1,868s
Compiling scriptlets: 95887 calls 1,11s
Making deep-data.json: 1 calls 0,993s
Clone image: 420 calls 0,868s
JSONMaker.makeTree: 1 calls 0,732s
Compiling script: 4 calls 0,587s
AlbumBean.processFilters: 1043 calls 0,114s
Process expression: 1 calls 0,011s
Copy res files: 1 calls 0,007s
Total: 556864 calls 35m 35,297s
Nevertheless, I found " Camera date cache miss" 9,233 times in the console.
Cheers, Markus
|
|
|
Posts:
3,624
Registered:
18-Oct-2002
|
|
|
Re: jAlbum 37 beta for testing
Posted:
20 Jan 25, 11:01
in response to: MarkusD
|
|
|
Thanks Markus. Is the camera date cache miss relating to directories or individual images?
|
|
|
Posts:
3,999
Registered:
4-Aug-2006
|
|
|
Re: jAlbum 37 beta for testing
Posted:
20 Jan 25, 12:16
in response to: davidekholm
|
|
|
Would it not be easier, for you and the user, if only image formats that had multiple readers/writers are shown? At the very least if there is only one reader/writer for a format then it/they should be greyed out.
Well, some users experience crashes with some DNG files, and removing the RAW support by unticking the RAW reader would be an easy workaround until we've rewritten the RAW support. I'd prefer to keep it like this, it's under Preferences->Advanced after all.
Ok. Is the dng failures related to waiting LibRawFX or has this bug:
https://jalbum.net/forum/message.jspa?messageID=356951#356951
Been fixed?
|
|
|
Posts:
3,624
Registered:
18-Oct-2002
|
|
|
Re: jAlbum 37 beta for testing
Posted:
20 Jan 25, 17:09
in response to: RobM
|
|
|
Would it not be easier, for you and the user, if only image formats that had multiple readers/writers are shown? At the very least if there is only one reader/writer for a format then it/they should be greyed out.
Well, some users experience crashes with some DNG files, and removing the RAW support by unticking the RAW reader would be an easy workaround until we've rewritten the RAW support. I'd prefer to keep it like this, it's under Preferences->Advanced after all.
Ok. Is the dng failures related to waiting LibRawFX or has this bug:
https://jalbum.net/forum/message.jspa?messageID=356951#356951
Been fixed?
Yes, it's related and no, it hasn't been fixed. It's on my todo to address.
|
|
|
Posts:
3,624
Registered:
18-Oct-2002
|
|
|
Re: jAlbum 37 beta for testing
Posted:
20 Jan 25, 17:18
in response to: davidekholm
|
|
|
Guys, I now have b4 available for you via a beta core update from https://jalbum.net/download/beta/jalbum-core.jar
Changes:
- Progress bars now display video progress as well
- Fixed bug where progress bars weren't sometimes updated between processing of two videos
- Fixed bug where progress bars could take a step back
- "Force remake" no longer forces reprocessing of videos. This setting now applies to images only (as video processing is so much more expensive). To also have videos reprocessed, like before, hold down ALT while selecting "Force remake".
- MultiMaker also adjusted so SHIFT-ALT forces video reprocessing as well. To only reprocess images, only hold down SHIFT (changed from ALT to be symmetric with main UI)
Jeff, I finally addressed this one (not forcing video rebuilds). Fast right 
|
|
|
Posts:
8,436
Registered:
31-Jan-2006
|
|
|
Re: jAlbum 37 beta for testing
Posted:
20 Jan 25, 17:42
in response to: davidekholm
|
|
|
Jeff, I finally addressed this one (not forcing video rebuilds).
You win the prize for the week.
That's been a longstanding problem - sometimes, you really want to generate all new slide images, or even just thumbnails (even more common, I think), but you don't want to reprocess all the videos.
|
|
|
Posts:
8,436
Registered:
31-Jan-2006
|
|
|
Re: jAlbum 37 beta for testing
Posted:
20 Jan 25, 18:42
in response to: davidekholm
|
|
|
This core is giving me 36b3.
|
|
|
Posts:
682
Registered:
13-Apr-2006
|
|
|
Re: jAlbum 37 beta for testing
Posted:
20 Jan 25, 18:48
in response to: davidekholm
|
|
|
Thanks Markus. Is the camera date cache miss relating to directories or individual images?
Both. I searched for "Camera date cache miss for" in my console log and found it 9,233 times.
3,824 files are PNG
1,341 files are PDF
2,602 files are JPG
Nearly all of these PNG files are screenshots, they don't have meta data. The PDF files too. And the JPG files are "real" photos, most of them, but, I deleted all meta data with the Exif GUI tool.
Cheer, Markus
|
|
|
Posts:
3,624
Registered:
18-Oct-2002
|
|
|
Re: jAlbum 37 beta for testing
Posted:
20 Jan 25, 19:05
in response to: JeffTucker
|
|
|
This core is giving me 36b3.
Really odd. I'm updating the file via the command line and I'm getting no errors, still it's the old file. Some stuck cache. I'll let Anders look into it. Until then, you can get the b4 from the "logical" location https://jalbum.net/download/beta2/jalbum-core.jar
|
|
|
|
Legend
|
|
Forum admins
|
|
Helpful Answer
|
|
Correct Answer
|
|