|
Replies:
5
-
Pages:
1
-
Last Post:
5 May 24, 19:24
Last Post By: JeffTucker
|
Threads:
[
Previous
|
Next
]
|
|
Posts:
27
Registered:
5-May-2012
|
|
|
Fixed or proportional signature?
Posted:
3 May 24, 13:12
|
|
|
Hello
I have image formats ranging from 900x600 pixels to 6000x4000.
The signature changes size depending on the size of the photos.
Is it possible to consider a choice:
[ ] Fixed
[ ] Proportional
Fixed, the signature would have the same size whatever the size of the image
In proportion... as currently.
Or maybe this is possible but I didn't understand
Best regard
Alain
Translated from French by Google trad
|
|
|
Posts:
8,204
Registered:
31-Jan-2006
|
|
|
Re: Fixed or proportional signature?
Posted:
3 May 24, 14:08
in response to: Moxa33
|
|
|
The skin doesn't produce the watermarks on the images - that's a function of the jAlbum core. I'll move this thread to General discussion.
|
|
|
Posts:
3,813
Registered:
4-Aug-2006
|
|
|
Re: Fixed or proportional signature?
Posted:
3 May 24, 18:23
in response to: Moxa33
|
|
|
For different size slide images try changing the scale factor in the logoType filter.
Alternatively instead of using ‘Settings > Effects > Logotype try using Settings > Advanced> User Variables where you can decide how to scale the logo/signature. Set the prescale to true or false.
|
|
|
Posts:
27
Registered:
5-May-2012
|
|
|
Re: Fixed or proportional signature?
Posted:
4 May 24, 12:22
in response to: RobM
|
|
|
Merci beaucoup.
Thank you so much
|
|
|
Posts:
27
Registered:
5-May-2012
|
|
|
Re: Fixed or proportional signature?
Posted:
4 May 24, 12:22
in response to: Moxa33
|
|
|
|
Sorry I come back ...
I didn't succeed, here are some screenshots.
Photo 1: The place where I put my signature.
Photo 2: signature at the correct size for the slideshow
Photo 3; signature at the wrong size in the same slideshow
Photo 4: JAlbum settings
I don't know how to edit this line...
Could my question become a suggestion for a future version :
A checkbox for Proportional or not ?
Best regards from Bordeaux (France)
Alain
Edited by: Moxa33 on 5 May 2024, 18:24
Edited by: Moxa33 on 5 May 2024, 18:25
|
|
|
Posts:
8,204
Registered:
31-Jan-2006
|
|
|
Re: Fixed or proportional signature?
Posted:
5 May 24, 19:24
in response to: Moxa33
|
|
Correct |
|
|
It is physically impossible to make this work the way you want. Here's why....
When you apply a logo (or watermark) to an image, that logo is added to the image during jAlbum processing. It's not somehow "overlaid" on the image - it actually becomes part of the image, as if it had been there when you took the photo.
Let's say you want the logo to always be the same size, say, 60px tall. jAlbum will make your 60px logo part of every image it processes, whether the image is 800x600 or 2000x1500.
But now what happens when you view the image in a browser? If you're on a huge monitor, you will see the 800x600 image at its full native size, and the logo with be 60px tall. You will also see the 2000x1500 image at its full native size, and the logo will be 60px tall.
But if you view the album on a laptop, you might still see the 800x600 image at its full native size, with its 60px logo. But the larger image will be reduced, so that fits in the browser window. So instead of showing it at 2000x1500, it might shown at 1000x750, half the native size. But that means that the logo will also be shown at half its size. It must shrink with the image, because it's part of the image - it isn't a separate thing.
The only solution would be to apply the logo at viewing time, as an absolutely-positioned overlay on the image, using CSS. But that would defeat the purpose of the logo or watermark. Even a complete amateur could remove the overlay, using simple browser tools. He wouldn't even need to download the image and work on it in some other image-processing application.
|
|
|
|
Legend
|
|
Forum admins
|
|
Helpful Answer
|
|
Correct Answer
|
|