The skin itself supports variants and I think it's a great way to provide large images where it's needed for zooming and for retina displays. So I would not remove that option altogether.
Good idea. Include a very large, blocky, low-quality
WebP image, and let the site visitor zoom in on it so that he can see just how bad it is.
"Increase the
WebP quality." To get the same quality as an equivalent
JPG, you end up with an image file that's even larger than the
JPG. So if you want to include huge images for zooming, use
JPG, not the jAlbum core default of
WebP.
I don't have a Retina display to experiment with, but my understanding is that they were invented to improve the appearance of small page elements, like icons and thumbnails. I'd be curious to know if anyone can see the difference between a large, "fill the screen" regular image and a double-density image shown in the same space.