This question is answered. Helpful answers available: 2. Correct answers available: 1.


Permlink Replies: 17 - Pages: 2 [ Previous | 1 2 ] - Last Post: 9 Aug 26, 14:19 Last Post By: JeffTucker Threads: [ Previous | Next ]
JeffTucker

Posts: 8,586
Registered: 31-Jan-2006
Re: New Albums return 403 Forbidden. I recognise unlikely to be the software
Posted: 9 Aug 26, 01:15   in response to: jafojtik in response to: jafojtik
 
  Click to reply to this thread Reply
Yeah, simplicity, along with all the delightful security risks. I don't think it will be long before standard browsers will simply refuse to connect to an insecure site. Why should they?

Even bargain web hosts offer SSL (it's actually TLS these days) for free. Mine simply started defaulting to it quite a few years ago. I never had to configure anything, install anything, or purchase anything.
zzdpmjpr

Posts: 2
Registered: 15-Apr-2016
Re: New Albums return 403 Forbidden. I recognise unlikely to be the software
Posted: 9 Aug 26, 14:12   in response to: zzdpmjpr in response to: zzdpmjpr
 
  Click to reply to this thread Reply
Well that was a shock - so many interesting and helpful replies. My thanks to all of you.

I bumped into the solution yesterday evening. I generally use JAlbum only once or twice a year so any workflow is not embedded in my brain. This time I uploaded the new albums, 'manually', using FTP. Didn't give it a second thought - it's only uploading some files! Anyway using the uploader in JAlbum of course it worked. I have no idea what the difference is. Anyway I won't ever do it that way again!!!

Many thanks again for your engagement and your advice on the insecure site. I will address this shortly.

John
JeffTucker

Posts: 8,586
Registered: 31-Jan-2006
Re: New Albums return 403 Forbidden. I recognise unlikely to be the software
Posted: 9 Aug 26, 14:19   in response to: zzdpmjpr in response to: zzdpmjpr
 
  Click to reply to this thread Reply
Very mysterious - I'll have to mull over that one!

The jAlbum uploader is always the better choice, anyway. Because it uses a manifest file to keep track of what it's put on the site, it can do the uploads of updated albums in a fraction of the time. FileZilla has to check each file - "is this new, is this changed?" The jAlbum uploader doesn't have to go through that laborious process.

Just did some checking. Chrome is going to start actively blocking http sites in October 2026. A visitor will still be able to say, "yes, go ahead and connect," but it'll probably take the form of scary warnings, so people will usually shy away.
Legend
Forum admins
Helpful Answer
Correct Answer

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in all forums