Reply to this Thread Reply to this Thread Search Forum Search Forum Back to Thread List Back to Thread List

Permlink Replies: 33 - Pages: 3 [ Previous | 1 2 3 ] - Last Post: 13 Feb 25, 12:47 Last Post By: davidekholm
RobM

Posts: 3,967
Registered: 4-Aug-2006
Re: Updated RAW file support for jAlbum
Posted: 12 Feb 25, 13:50   in response to: davidekholm in response to: davidekholm
  Click to reply to this thread Reply
I’ll email you one later today, as soon as I’m able to. Am I correct in thinking a zero value should not change the exposure, or could the raw files baseline exposure be other than zero? If exposure compensation is unchecked I assume nothing is applied.

I only know enough to get me into trouble.
https://www.rawdigger.com/howtouse/deriving-hidden-ble-compensation
davidekholm

Posts: 3,666
Registered: 18-Oct-2002
Re: Updated RAW file support for jAlbum
Posted: 12 Feb 25, 14:53   in response to: RobM in response to: RobM
  Click to reply to this thread Reply
Yes, a zero EV (exposure compensation value) should not affect the image
RobM

Posts: 3,967
Registered: 4-Aug-2006
Re: Updated RAW file support for jAlbum
Posted: 12 Feb 25, 20:02   in response to: davidekholm in response to: davidekholm
  Click to reply to this thread Reply
Emailed you 3 images, a subtle change, an obvious change and no apparent change.
davidekholm

Posts: 3,666
Registered: 18-Oct-2002
Re: Updated RAW file support for jAlbum
Posted: 13 Feb 25, 12:47   in response to: RobM in response to: RobM
  Click to reply to this thread Reply
Thanks, got them
Pages: 3 [ Previous | 1 2 3 ]
Back to Thread List Back to Thread List
Legend
Forum admins
Helpful Answer
Correct Answer

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in all forums