This question is answered. Helpful answers available: 2. Correct answers available: 1.


Permlink Replies: 1 - Pages: 1 - Last Post: 28 Jun 23, 17:07 Last Post By: davidekholm
JeffTucker

Posts: 8,090
Registered: 31-Jan-2006
A few anachronistic filters
Posted: 27 Jun 23, 13:14
 
  Click to reply to this thread Reply
(Summarizing several related threads, now deleted....)

Several of the jAlbum filters have outlived their usefulness. They trigger reprocessing and reuploading of all the images, but what they're accomplishing can be done much more easily with universally-supported CSS, which requires no image processing. Not a high priority, but these should all eventually be removed, or at least turned into "no op" methods:

BlurFilter. CSS equivalent: img {filter: blur(3px);}, plus overflow: hidden; on the containing element.

GrayScale. CSS equivalent: img {filter: grayscale(1);}. This option should also be removed from the Effects panel.

MarginFilter. CSS equivalent: img {border: 10px solid rgba(170 170 170 / 0.2);}. In this case, the CSS is superior because the margin/border doesn't expand or shrink along with the image when placed in a responsive layout.

ZoomFilter. CSS equivalent: img {transform: scale(1.3);}, plus overflow: hidden; on the containing element.
davidekholm

Posts: 3,699
Registered: 18-Oct-2002
Re: A few anachronistic filters
Posted: 28 Jun 23, 17:07   in response to: JeffTucker in response to: JeffTucker
 
  Click to reply to this thread Reply
Thanks for your feedback. I'll discuss this with Anders and Laza
Legend
Forum admins
Helpful Answer
Correct Answer

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in all forums