Permlink Replies: 31 - Pages: 3 [ Previous | 1 2 3 ] - Last Post: 15-Aug-2017 11:53 Last Post By: davidekholm Threads: [ Previous | Next ]
RobM

Posts: 4,385
Registered: 4-Aug-2006
Re: Keyword Labels Maxing at 30
Posted: 14-Aug-2017 23:45   in response to: davidekholm in response to: davidekholm
  Click to reply to this thread Reply
davidekholm wrote:
Most developers will probably appreciate the straight forward syntax.
Does any of this need a health warning should a hack try to write to objects (is it all threadsafe/sychronised - will it work)?

I have added a section to the Sample scripts page which includes a link back here, probably easier than trawling through the forum in a few months time.
davidekholm

Posts: 21,479
Registered: 18-Oct-2002
Re: Keyword Labels Maxing at 30
Posted: 15-Aug-2017 11:53   in response to: RobM in response to: RobM
  Click to reply to this thread Reply
RobM wrote:
davidekholm wrote:
Most developers will probably appreciate the straight forward syntax.
Does any of this need a health warning should a hack try to write to objects (is it all threadsafe/sychronised - will it work)?

There is no thread safety but as long as each thread manipulate the data of its "own" AlbumObject, then there is no interference. If you interact with shared data, ensure you synchronize some how (by using the synchronized keyword or use atomic objects (see AtomicInteger and such)

I have added a section to the Sample scripts page which includes a link back here, probably easier than trawling through the forum in a few months time.

Thanks
Legend
Forum admins
Helpful Answer
Correct Answer

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in all forums